![]() ![]()
Otherwise you will find you are constantly flip flopping around from driver to driver and managing multiple queues for simple tasks that could be managed by a single queue which is slightly worse in some scenarios but essentially works.Does any one know what the differences are between PCL5, PCL5E and PCL6? Are there any differences in the commands supported? Its not worth mulling over what is technically the best for a given task until you notice a problem. If you like XPS and it works for you then I'd suggest to continue using it. It's actually the driver I've been using most so far I've been using most so far You will have to explore around here unless you have a more specific question. I'm wondering how it works and if it's technically better. We haven't found a situation where we default to that print driver yet. I have only used XPS as a document conversion tool. XPS can be used as a physical print driver but that process goes beyond my expertise on the subject. However in this case XPS actually is also a printer driver!įair enough, you are correct on that point. You should use whatever works best for yourself and your printing needs. Performance issues are less of a concern than helpdesk calls for error messages. We typically default to PS because it gives us the least amount of problems overall. There are lots of articles highlighting the pros and cons such as: ![]() #DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MP AND XPS PRINTER DRIVERS PDF#Similar to XPS would be the Adobe PDF document writer driver used to convert jobs into PDF documents.Īny help or knowledge would be appreciated here. Nope, XPS is not used for physical printing of documents. So is it a good middleground between the quality of PS and the speed of PCL? ![]() Once you convert a document using XPS you then have to print the XPS document just like any other normal print job with PCL or PS. Its not a print driver that you use to communicate directly with a printer. Thus it may appear to be faster depending on what you are doing at the time.Īnd XPS is apparently a new format similar to PS in some ways and while it may not be inferior, will not find as widespread support in operating systems. PCL processes part of the print job on the printer. Whereas PCL6 sounds to be less hardware demanding and faster This makes it simpler and more universal with other printer models. Postscript does all of the processing on the users machine. So I understand the PostScript is technically better quality (though not something that's likely to be noticed in the basic print jobs I need), #DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MP AND XPS PRINTER DRIVERS DRIVERS#Print drivers all have various pros and cons, there is no ultimate driver that's the best at everything. Use whichever one doesn't consistently cause you problems. Just that I'm wondering what would be the optimal driver to use. So is it a good middleground between the quality of PS and the speed of PCL? Any help or knowledge would be appreciated here. So I understand it has some advantages not quite sure. Then there's the XPS driver - here I've been having trouble finding out how it compares to PS or PCL. So I understand the PostScript is technically better quality (though not something that's likely to be noticed in the basic print jobs I need), whereas PCL6 sounds to be less hardware demanding and faster (which is important since no one likes to wait for pages to roll out). I've been trying to read up on the differences. ![]() All can work fine, I'm just trying to choose one here and want it to be the best option. It's just that I'm wondering what would be the optimal driver to use. I connected it to the network and all and it works fine. I recently installed a new 2nd hand printer for a classroom environment - Develop ineo+ 35 (Generic Color MF30-1). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |